Micron Ships Denser & Faster 276 Layer TLC NAND, Arriving First In Micron 2650 Client SSDs
Micron on Tuesday announced that the company has begun shipping its 9th Generation (G9) 276 layer TLC NAND. The next generation of NAND from the prolific memory maker, Micron's latest NAND is designed to further push the envelope on TLC NAND performance, offering significant density and performance improvements over its existing NAND technology.
Micron's G9 TLC NAND memory features 276 active layers, which is up from 232-layers in case of Micron's previous generation TLC NAND. At this point the company is being light on technical details in their official material. However in a brief interview with Blocks & Files, the company confirmed that their 276L NAND still uses a six plane architecture, which was first introduced with the 232L generation. At this point we're assuming Micron is also string-stacking two decks of NAND together, as they have been for the past couple of generations, which means we're looking at 138 layer decks.
| Micron TLC NAND Flash Memory | |||
| 276L | 232L (B58R) |
176L (B47R) |
|
| Layers | 276 | 232 | 176 |
| Decks | 2 (x138)? | 2 (x116) | 2 (x88) |
| Die Capacity | 1 Tbit | 1 Tbit | 512 Gbit |
| Die Size (mm2) | ~48.9mm2 | ~70.1mm2 | ~49.8mm2 |
| Density (Gbit/mm2) | ~21 | 14.6 | 10.3 |
| I/O Speed | 3.6 GT/s (ONFi 5.1) |
2.4 GT/s (ONFi 5.0) |
1.6 GT/s (ONFI 4.2) |
| Planes | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| CuA / PuC | Yes | Yes | Yes |
On the density front, Micron told Blocks & Files that they have improved their NAND density by 44% over their 232L generation. Which, given what we know about that generation, would put the density at around 21 Gbit/mm2. Or for a 1Tbit die of TLC NAND, that works out to a die size of roughly 48.9mm2, comparable to the die size of a 512Gbit TLC die from Micron's older 176L NAND.
Besides improving density, the other big push with Micron's newest generation of NAND was further improving its throughput. While the company's 232L NAND was built against the ONFi 5.0 specification, which topped out at transfer rates of 2400 MT/sec, their new 276L NAND can hit 3600 MT/sec, which is consistent with the ONFi 5.1 spec.
Meanwhile, the eagle-eyed will likely also pick up on Micron's ninth-generation/G9 branding, which is new to the company. Micron's has not previously used this kind of generational branding for their NAND, which up until now has simply been identified by its layer count (and before the 3D era, its feature size). Internally, this is believed to be Micron's 7th generation 3D NAND architecture. However, taking a page from the logic fab industry, Micron seems to be branding it as ninth-generation in order to keep generational parity with its competitors, who are preparing their own 8th/9th generation NAND (and thus cliam that they are the first NAND maker to ship 9th gen NAND).
And while this NAND will eventually end up in ... SSDs
Posted by The Techinical Support
Silicon Motion Demonstrates Flexible Data Placement on MonTitan Gen 5 Enterprise SSD Platform 
At FMS 2024, the technological requirements from the storage and memory subsystem took center stage. Both SSD and controller vendors had various demonstrations touting their suitability for different stages of the AI data pipeline - ingestion, preparation, training, checkpointing, and inference. Vendors like Solidigm have different types of SSDs optimized for different stages of the pipeline. At the same time, controller vendors have taken advantage of one of the features introduced recently in the NVM Express standard - Flexible Data Placement (FDP).
FDP involves the host providing information / hints about the areas where the controller could place the incoming write data in order to reduce the write amplification. These hints are generated based on specific block sizes advertised by the device. The feature is completely backwards-compatible, with non-FDP hosts working just as before with FDP-enabled SSDs, and vice-versa.
Silicon Motion's MonTitan Gen 5 Enterprise SSD Platform was announced back in 2022. Since then, Silicon Motion has been touting the flexibility of the platform, allowing its customers to incorporate their own features as part of the customization process. This approach is common in the enterprise space, as we have seen with Marvell's Bravera SC5 SSD controller in the DapuStor SSDs and Microchip's Flashtec controllers in the Longsys FORESEE enterprise SSDs.
At FMS 2024, the company was demonstrating the advantages of flexible data placement by allowing a single QLC SSD based on their MonTitan platform to take part in different stages of the AI data pipeline while maintaining the required quality of service (minimum bandwidth) for each process. The company even has a trademarked name (PerformaShape) for the firmware feature in the controller that allows the isolation of different concurrent SSD accesses (from different stages in the AI data pipeline) to guarantee this QoS. Silicon Motion claims that this scheme will enable its customers to get the maximum write performance possible from QLC SSDs without negatively impacting the performance of other types of accesses.
Silicon Motion and Phison have market leadership in the client SSD controller market with similar approaches. However, their enterprise SSD controller marketing couldn't be more different. While Phison has gone in for a turnkey solution with their Gen 5 SSD platform (to the extent of not adopting the white label route for this generation, and instead opting to get the SSDs qualified with different cloud service providers themselves), Silicon Motion is opting for a different approach. The flexibility and customization possibilities can make platforms like the MonTitan appeal to flash array vendors.
Storage
U.S. Signs $1.5B in CHIPS Act Agreements With Amkor and SKhynix for Chip Packaging Plants 
Under the CHIPS & Science Act, the U.S. government provided tens of billions of dollars in grants and loans to the world's leading maker of chips, such as Intel, Samsung, and TSMC, which will significantly expand the country's semiconductor production industry in the coming years. However, most chips are typically tested, assembled, and packaged in Asia, which has left the American supply chain incomplete. Addressing this last gap in the government's domestic chip production plans, these past couple of weeks the U.S. government signed memorandums of understanding worth about $1.5 billion with Amkor and SK hynix to support their efforts to build chip packaging facilities in the U.S.
Amkor to Build Advanced Packaging Facility with Apple in Mind
Amkor plans to build a $2 billion advanced packaging facility near Peoria, Arizona, to test and assemble chips produced by TSMC at its Fab 21 near Phoenix, Arizona. The company signed a MOU that offers $400 million in direct funding and access to $200 million in loans under the CHIPS & Science Act. In addition, the company plans to take advantage of a 25% investment tax credit on eligible capital expenditures.
Set to be strategically positioned near TSMC's upcoming Fab 21 complex in Arizona, Amkor's Peoria facility will occupy 55 acres and, when fully completed, will feature over 500,000 square feet (46,451 square meters) of cleanroom space, more than twice the size of Amkor's advanced packaging site in Vietnam. Although the company has not disclosed the exact capacity or the specific technologies the facility will support, it is expected to cater to a wide range of industries, including automotive, high-performance computing, and mobile technologies. This suggests the new plant will offer diverse packaging solutions, including traditional, 2.5D, and 3D technologies.
Amkor has collaborated extensively with Apple on the vision and initial setup of the Peoria facility, as Apple is slated to be the facility's first and largest customer, marking a significant commitment from the tech giant. This partnership highlights the importance of the new facility in reinforcing the U.S. semiconductor supply chain and positioning Amkor as a key partner for companies relying on TSMC's manufacturing capabilities. The project is expected to generate around 2,000 jobs and is scheduled to begin operations in 2027.
SK hynix to Build HBM4 in the U.S.
This week SK hynix also signed a preliminary agreement with the U.S. government to receive up to $450 million in direct funding and $500 million in loans to build an advanced memory packaging facility in West Lafayette, Indiana.
The proposed facility is scheduled to begin operations in 2028, which means that it will assemble HBM4 or HBM4E memory. Meanwhile, DRAM devices for high bandwidth memory (HBM) stacks will still be produced in South Korea. Nonetheless, packing finished HBM4/HBM4E in the U.S. and possibly integrating these memory modules with high-end processors is a big deal.
In addition to building its packaging plant, SK hynix plans to collaborate with Purdue University and other local research institutions to advance semiconductor technology and packaging innovations. This partnership is intended to bolster research and development in the region, positioning the facility as a hub for AI technology and skilled employment.
Semiconductors
Fadu's FC5161 SSD Controller Breaks Cover in Western Digital's PCIe Gen5 Enterprise Drives 
When Western Digital introduced its Ultrastar DC SN861 SSDs earlier this year, the company did not disclose which controller it used for these drives, which made many observers presume that WD was using an in-house controller. But a recent teardown of the drive shows that is not the case; instead, the company is using a controller from Fadu, a South Korean company founded in 2015 that specializes on enterprise-grade turnkey SSD solutions.
The Western Digital Ultrastar DC SN861 SSD is aimed at performance-hungry hyperscale datacenters and enterprise customers which are adopting PCIe Gen5 storage devices these days. And, as uncovered in photos from a recent Storage Review article, the drive is based on Fadu's FC5161 NVMe 2.0-compliant controller. The FC5161 utilizes 16 NAND channels supporting an ONFi 5.0 2400 MT/s interface, and features a combination of enterprise-grade capabilities (OCP Cloud Spec 2.0, SR-IOV, up to 512 name spaces for ZNS support, flexible data placement, NVMe-MI 1.2, advanced security, telemetry, power loss protection) not available on other off-the-shelf controllers – or on any previous Western Digital controllers.
The Ultrastar DC SN861 SSD offers sequential read speeds up to 13.7 GB/s as well as sequential write speeds up to 7.5 GB/s. As for random performance, it boasts with an up to 3.3 million random 4K read IOPS and up to 0.8 million random 4K write IOPS. The drives are available in capacities between 1.6 TB and 7.68 TB with one or three drive writes per day (DWPD) over five years rating as well as in U.2 and E1.S form-factors.
While the two form factors of the SN861 share a similar technical design, Western Digital has tailored each version for distinct workloads: the E1.S supports FDP and performance enhancements specifically for cloud environments. By contrast, the U.2 model is geared towards high-performance enterprise tasks and emerging applications like AI.
Without any doubts, Western Digital's Ultrastar DC SN861 is a feature-rich high-performance enterprise-grade SSD. It has another distinctive feature: a 5W idle power consumption, which is rather low by the standards of enterprise-grade drives (e.g., it is 1W lower compared to the SN840). While the difference with predecessors may be just 1W, hyperscalers deploy thousands of drives and for their TCO every watt counts.
Western Digital's Ultrastar DC SN861 SSDs are now available for purchase to select customers (such as Meta) and to interested parties. Prices are unknown, but they will depend on such factors as volumes.
Sources: Fadu, Storage Review
Storage
Silicon Motion Demonstrates Flexible Data Placement on MonTitan Gen 5 Enterprise SSD Platform
At FMS 2024, the technological requirements from the storage and memory subsystem took center stage. Both SSD and controller vendors had various demonstrations touting their suitability for different stages of the AI data pipeline - ingestion, preparation, training, checkpointing, and inference. Vendors like Solidigm have different types of SSDs optimized for different stages of the pipeline. At the same time, controller vendors have taken advantage of one of the features introduced recently in the NVM Express standard - Flexible Data Placement (FDP).
FDP involves the host providing information / hints about the areas where the controller could place the incoming write data in order to reduce the write amplification. These hints are generated based on specific block sizes advertised by the device. The feature is completely backwards-compatible, with non-FDP hosts working just as before with FDP-enabled SSDs, and vice-versa.
Silicon Motion's MonTitan Gen 5 Enterprise SSD Platform was announced back in 2022. Since then, Silicon Motion has been touting the flexibility of the platform, allowing its customers to incorporate their own features as part of the customization process. This approach is common in the enterprise space, as we have seen with Marvell's Bravera SC5 SSD controller in the DapuStor SSDs and Microchip's Flashtec controllers in the Longsys FORESEE enterprise SSDs.
At FMS 2024, the company was demonstrating the advantages of flexible data placement by allowing a single QLC SSD based on their MonTitan platform to take part in different stages of the AI data pipeline while maintaining the required quality of service (minimum bandwidth) for each process. The company even has a trademarked name (PerformaShape) for the firmware feature in the controller that allows the isolation of different concurrent SSD accesses (from different stages in the AI data pipeline) to guarantee this QoS. Silicon Motion claims that this scheme will enable its customers to get the maximum write performance possible from QLC SSDs without negatively impacting the performance of other types of accesses.
Silicon Motion and Phison have market leadership in the client SSD controller market with similar approaches. However, their enterprise SSD controller marketing couldn't be more different. While Phison has gone in for a turnkey solution with their Gen 5 SSD platform (to the extent of not adopting the white label route for this generation, and instead opting to get the SSDs qualified with different cloud service providers themselves), Silicon Motion is opting for a different approach. The flexibility and customization possibilities can make platforms like the MonTitan appeal to flash array vendors.
Storage
U.S. Signs $1.5B in CHIPS Act Agreements With Amkor and SKhynix for Chip Packaging Plants
Under the CHIPS & Science Act, the U.S. government provided tens of billions of dollars in grants and loans to the world's leading maker of chips, such as Intel, Samsung, and TSMC, which will significantly expand the country's semiconductor production industry in the coming years. However, most chips are typically tested, assembled, and packaged in Asia, which has left the American supply chain incomplete. Addressing this last gap in the government's domestic chip production plans, these past couple of weeks the U.S. government signed memorandums of understanding worth about $1.5 billion with Amkor and SK hynix to support their efforts to build chip packaging facilities in the U.S.
Amkor to Build Advanced Packaging Facility with Apple in Mind
Amkor plans to build a $2 billion advanced packaging facility near Peoria, Arizona, to test and assemble chips produced by TSMC at its Fab 21 near Phoenix, Arizona. The company signed a MOU that offers $400 million in direct funding and access to $200 million in loans under the CHIPS & Science Act. In addition, the company plans to take advantage of a 25% investment tax credit on eligible capital expenditures.
Set to be strategically positioned near TSMC's upcoming Fab 21 complex in Arizona, Amkor's Peoria facility will occupy 55 acres and, when fully completed, will feature over 500,000 square feet (46,451 square meters) of cleanroom space, more than twice the size of Amkor's advanced packaging site in Vietnam. Although the company has not disclosed the exact capacity or the specific technologies the facility will support, it is expected to cater to a wide range of industries, including automotive, high-performance computing, and mobile technologies. This suggests the new plant will offer diverse packaging solutions, including traditional, 2.5D, and 3D technologies.
Amkor has collaborated extensively with Apple on the vision and initial setup of the Peoria facility, as Apple is slated to be the facility's first and largest customer, marking a significant commitment from the tech giant. This partnership highlights the importance of the new facility in reinforcing the U.S. semiconductor supply chain and positioning Amkor as a key partner for companies relying on TSMC's manufacturing capabilities. The project is expected to generate around 2,000 jobs and is scheduled to begin operations in 2027.
SK hynix to Build HBM4 in the U.S.
This week SK hynix also signed a preliminary agreement with the U.S. government to receive up to $450 million in direct funding and $500 million in loans to build an advanced memory packaging facility in West Lafayette, Indiana.
The proposed facility is scheduled to begin operations in 2028, which means that it will assemble HBM4 or HBM4E memory. Meanwhile, DRAM devices for high bandwidth memory (HBM) stacks will still be produced in South Korea. Nonetheless, packing finished HBM4/HBM4E in the U.S. and possibly integrating these memory modules with high-end processors is a big deal.
In addition to building its packaging plant, SK hynix plans to collaborate with Purdue University and other local research institutions to advance semiconductor technology and packaging innovations. This partnership is intended to bolster research and development in the region, positioning the facility as a hub for AI technology and skilled employment.
Semiconductors
Fadu's FC5161 SSD Controller Breaks Cover in Western Digital's PCIe Gen5 Enterprise Drives
When Western Digital introduced its Ultrastar DC SN861 SSDs earlier this year, the company did not disclose which controller it used for these drives, which made many observers presume that WD was using an in-house controller. But a recent teardown of the drive shows that is not the case; instead, the company is using a controller from Fadu, a South Korean company founded in 2015 that specializes on enterprise-grade turnkey SSD solutions.
The Western Digital Ultrastar DC SN861 SSD is aimed at performance-hungry hyperscale datacenters and enterprise customers which are adopting PCIe Gen5 storage devices these days. And, as uncovered in photos from a recent Storage Review article, the drive is based on Fadu's FC5161 NVMe 2.0-compliant controller. The FC5161 utilizes 16 NAND channels supporting an ONFi 5.0 2400 MT/s interface, and features a combination of enterprise-grade capabilities (OCP Cloud Spec 2.0, SR-IOV, up to 512 name spaces for ZNS support, flexible data placement, NVMe-MI 1.2, advanced security, telemetry, power loss protection) not available on other off-the-shelf controllers – or on any previous Western Digital controllers.
The Ultrastar DC SN861 SSD offers sequential read speeds up to 13.7 GB/s as well as sequential write speeds up to 7.5 GB/s. As for random performance, it boasts with an up to 3.3 million random 4K read IOPS and up to 0.8 million random 4K write IOPS. The drives are available in capacities between 1.6 TB and 7.68 TB with one or three drive writes per day (DWPD) over five years rating as well as in U.2 and E1.S form-factors.
While the two form factors of the SN861 share a similar technical design, Western Digital has tailored each version for distinct workloads: the E1.S supports FDP and performance enhancements specifically for cloud environments. By contrast, the U.2 model is geared towards high-performance enterprise tasks and emerging applications like AI.
Without any doubts, Western Digital's Ultrastar DC SN861 is a feature-rich high-performance enterprise-grade SSD. It has another distinctive feature: a 5W idle power consumption, which is rather low by the standards of enterprise-grade drives (e.g., it is 1W lower compared to the SN840). While the difference with predecessors may be just 1W, hyperscalers deploy thousands of drives and for their TCO every watt counts.
Western Digital's Ultrastar DC SN861 SSDs are now available for purchase to select customers (such as Meta) and to interested parties. Prices are unknown, but they will depend on such factors as volumes.
Sources: Fadu, Storage Review
Storage
CXL Gathers Momentum at FMS 2024 
The CXL consortium has had a regular presence at FMS (which rechristened itself from 'Flash Memory Summit' to the 'Future of Memory and Storage' this year). Back at FMS 2022, the company had announced v3.0 of the CXL specifications. This was followed by CXL 3.1's introduction at Supercomputing 2023. Having started off as a host to device interconnect standard, it had slowly subsumed other competing standards such as OpenCAPI and Gen-Z. As a result, the specifications started to encompass a wide variety of use-cases by building a protocol on top of the the ubiquitous PCIe expansion bus. The CXL consortium comprises of heavyweights such as AMD and Intel, as well as a large number of startup companies attempting to play in different segments on the device side. At FMS 2024, CXL had a prime position in the booth demos of many vendors.
The migration of server platforms from DDR4 to DDR5, along with the rise of workloads demanding large RAM capacity (but not particularly sensitive to either memory bandwidth or latency), has opened up memory expansion modules as one of the first set of widely available CXL devices. Over the last couple of years, we have had product announcements from Samsung and Micron in this area.
SK hynix CMM-DDR5 CXL Memory Module and HMSDK
At FMS 2024, SK hynix was showing off their DDR5-based CMM-DDR5 CXL memory module with a 128 GB capacity. The company was also detailing their associated Heterogeneous Memory Software Development Kit (HMSDK) - a set of libraries and tools at both the kernel and user levels aimed at increasing the ease of use of CXL memory. This is achieved in part by considering the memory pyramid / hierarchy and relocating the data between the server's main memory (DRAM) and the CXL device based on usage frequency.
The CMM-DDR5 CXL memory module comes in the SDFF form-factor (E3.S 2T) with a PCIe 3.0 x8 host interface. The internal memory is based on 1α technology DRAM, and the device promises DDR5-class bandwidth and latency within a single NUMA hop. As these memory modules are meant to be used in datacenters and enterprises, the firmware includes features for RAS (reliability, availability, and serviceability) along with secure boot and other management features.
SK hynix was also demonstrating Niagara 2.0 - a hardware solution (currently based on FPGAs) to enable memory pooling and sharing - i.e, connecting multiple CXL memories to allow different hosts (CPUs and GPUs) to optimally share their capacity. The previous version only allowed capacity sharing, but the latest version enables sharing of data also. SK hynix had presented these solutions at the CXL DevCon 2024 earlier this year, but some progress seems to have been made in finalizing the specifications of the CMM-DDR5 at FMS 2024.
Microchip and Micron Demonstrate CZ120 CXL Memory Expansion Module
Micron had unveiled the CZ120 CXL Memory Expansion Module last year based on the Microchip SMC 2000 series CXL memory controller. At FMS 2024, Micron and Microchip had a demonstration of the module on a Granite Rapids server.
Additional insights into the SMC 2000 controller were also provided.
The CXL memory controller also incorporates DRAM die failure handling, and Microchip also provides diagnostics and debug tools to analyze failed modules. The memory controller also supports ECC, which forms part of the enterprise... Storage
The Endorfy Fortis 5 Dual Fan CPU Cooler Review: Towering Value Standard CPU coolers, while adequate for managing basic thermal loads, often fall short in terms of noise reduction and superior cooling efficiency. This limitation drives advanced users and system builders to seek aftermarket solutions tailored to their specific needs. The high-end aftermarket cooler market is highly competitive, with manufacturers striving to offer products with exceptional performance.
Endorfy, previously known as SilentiumPC, is a Polish manufacturer that has undergone a significant transformation to expand its presence in global markets. The brand is known for delivering high-performance cooling solutions with a strong focus on balancing efficiency and affordability. By rebranding as Endorfy, the company aims to enter premium market segments while continuing to offer reliable, high-quality cooling products.
SilentiumPC became very popular in the value/mainstream segments of the PC market with their products, the spearhead of which probably was the Fera 5 cooler that we reviewed a little over two years ago and had a remarkable value for money. Today’s review places Endorfy’s largest CPU cooler, the Fortis 5 Dual Fan, on our laboratory test bench. The Fortis 5 is the largest CPU air cooler the company currently offers and is significantly more expensive than the Fera 5, yet it still is a single-tower cooler that strives to strike a balance between value, compatibility, and performance.
Cases/Cooling/PSUs
Fadu's FC5161 SSD Controller Breaks Cover in Western Digital's PCIe Gen5 Enterprise Drives
When Western Digital introduced its Ultrastar DC SN861 SSDs earlier this year, the company did not disclose which controller it used for these drives, which made many observers presume that WD was using an in-house controller. But a recent teardown of the drive shows that is not the case; instead, the company is using a controller from Fadu, a South Korean company founded in 2015 that specializes on enterprise-grade turnkey SSD solutions.
The Western Digital Ultrastar DC SN861 SSD is aimed at performance-hungry hyperscale datacenters and enterprise customers which are adopting PCIe Gen5 storage devices these days. And, as uncovered in photos from a recent Storage Review article, the drive is based on Fadu's FC5161 NVMe 2.0-compliant controller. The FC5161 utilizes 16 NAND channels supporting an ONFi 5.0 2400 MT/s interface, and features a combination of enterprise-grade capabilities (OCP Cloud Spec 2.0, SR-IOV, up to 512 name spaces for ZNS support, flexible data placement, NVMe-MI 1.2, advanced security, telemetry, power loss protection) not available on other off-the-shelf controllers – or on any previous Western Digital controllers.
The Ultrastar DC SN861 SSD offers sequential read speeds up to 13.7 GB/s as well as sequential write speeds up to 7.5 GB/s. As for random performance, it boasts with an up to 3.3 million random 4K read IOPS and up to 0.8 million random 4K write IOPS. The drives are available in capacities between 1.6 TB and 7.68 TB with one or three drive writes per day (DWPD) over five years rating as well as in U.2 and E1.S form-factors.
While the two form factors of the SN861 share a similar technical design, Western Digital has tailored each version for distinct workloads: the E1.S supports FDP and performance enhancements specifically for cloud environments. By contrast, the U.2 model is geared towards high-performance enterprise tasks and emerging applications like AI.
Without any doubts, Western Digital's Ultrastar DC SN861 is a feature-rich high-performance enterprise-grade SSD. It has another distinctive feature: a 5W idle power consumption, which is rather low by the standards of enterprise-grade drives (e.g., it is 1W lower compared to the SN840). While the difference with predecessors may be just 1W, hyperscalers deploy thousands of drives and for their TCO every watt counts.
Western Digital's Ultrastar DC SN861 SSDs are now available for purchase to select customers (such as Meta) and to interested parties. Prices are unknown, but they will depend on such factors as volumes.
Sources: Fadu, Storage Review
Storage
![](https://twitter.com/share?url=https://compbuddey.blogspot.com/2024/07/micron-ships-denser-faster-276-layer_31.html&text=Micron Ships Denser & Faster 276 Layer TLC NAND, Arriving First In Micron 2650 Client SSDs <p align="center"><a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/21492/micron-ships-denser-9th-generation-nand-276layers-and-2650-client-ssds"><img src="https://images.anandtech.com/doci/21492/product-g9-tlc-nand-product-on-board-3-2-all-others_575px.jpeg" alt="" /></a></p><p><p>Micron on Tuesday announced that the company has begun shipping its 9th Generation (G9) 276 layer TLC NAND. The next generation of NAND from the prolific memory maker, Micron's latest NAND is designed to further push the envelope on TLC NAND performance, offering significant density and performance improvements over its existing NAND technology.</p>
<p>Micron's G9 TLC NAND memory features 276 active layers, which is up from <a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/17509/microns-232-layer-nand-now-shipping">232-layers in case of Micron's previous generation TLC NAND</a>. At this point the company is being light on technical details in their official material. However in a brief interview with <a href="https://blocksandfiles.com/2024/07/30/micron-276-layer-3d-nand-2650-client-ssd/">Blocks & Files</a>, the company confirmed that their 276L NAND still uses a six plane architecture, which was first introduced with the 232L generation. At this point we're assuming Micron is also string-stacking two decks of NAND together, as they have been for the past couple of generations, which means we're looking at 138 layer decks.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="70%">
<tbody>
<tr class="tgrey">
<td align="center" colspan="4">Micron TLC NAND Flash Memory</td>
</tr>
<tr class="tlblue">
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1"> </td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">276L</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">232L<br />
(B58R)</td>
<td align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">176L<br />
(B47R)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Layers</td>
<td align="center">276</td>
<td align="center">232</td>
<td align="center">176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Decks</td>
<td align="center">2 (x138)?</td>
<td align="center">2 (x116)</td>
<td align="center">2 (x88)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Die Capacity</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1 Tbit</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1 Tbit</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">512 Gbit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Die Size (mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~48.9mm2</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~70.1mm2</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~49.8mm2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Density (Gbit/mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~21</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">14.6</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">10.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">I/O Speed</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">3.6 GT/s<br />
(ONFi 5.1)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">2.4 GT/s<br />
(ONFi 5.0)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1.6 GT/s<br />
(ONFI 4.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Planes</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">CuA / PuC</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>On the density front, Micron told Blocks & Files that they have improved their NAND density by 44% over their 232L generation. Which, given what we know about that generation, would put the density at around 21 Gbit/mm<sup>2</sup>. Or for a 1Tbit die of TLC NAND, that works out to a die size of roughly 48.9mm<sup>2</sup>, comparable to the die size of a 512Gbit TLC die from Micron's older 176L NAND.</p>
<p>Besides improving density, the other big push with Micron's newest generation of NAND was further improving its throughput. While the company's 232L NAND was built against the ONFi 5.0 specification, which topped out at transfer rates of 2400 MT/sec, their new 276L NAND can hit 3600 MT/sec, which is consistent with the ONFi 5.1 spec.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the eagle-eyed will likely also pick up on Micron's ninth-generation/G9 branding, which is new to the company. Micron's has not previously used this kind of generational branding for their NAND, which up until now has simply been identified by its layer count (and before the 3D era, its feature size). Internally, this is believed to be Micron's 7th generation 3D NAND architecture. However, taking a page from the logic fab industry, Micron seems to be branding it as ninth-generation in order to keep generational parity with its competitors, who are preparing their own 8th/9th generation NAND (and thus cliam that they are the first NAND maker to ship 9th gen NAND).</p>
<p>And while this NAND will eventually end up in ... SSDs){kind=link}
![](https://www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https://compbuddey.blogspot.com/2024/07/micron-ships-denser-faster-276-layer_31.html&media=https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_t6P_dxXqXdydwC7mEz9NAqu96Ig_BcGrKG6WxFnrKUz8JhEXpS9tA8c9p4E44b6ts--Oi9iIkjTrLyBi1gA3YU4EYJr7SUAxAg-Fw1Tk7PDERww7YFflf1EvQ8BDNBO-XnxZS5hSaSya1OZ6wT6BciTPiOmRnScMVmyvQ46jslQFKbcUlx06ss&description=Micron Ships Denser & Faster 276 Layer TLC NAND, Arriving First In Micron 2650 Client SSDs <p align="center"><a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/21492/micron-ships-denser-9th-generation-nand-276layers-and-2650-client-ssds"><img src="https://images.anandtech.com/doci/21492/product-g9-tlc-nand-product-on-board-3-2-all-others_575px.jpeg" alt="" /></a></p><p><p>Micron on Tuesday announced that the company has begun shipping its 9th Generation (G9) 276 layer TLC NAND. The next generation of NAND from the prolific memory maker, Micron's latest NAND is designed to further push the envelope on TLC NAND performance, offering significant density and performance improvements over its existing NAND technology.</p>
<p>Micron's G9 TLC NAND memory features 276 active layers, which is up from <a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/17509/microns-232-layer-nand-now-shipping">232-layers in case of Micron's previous generation TLC NAND</a>. At this point the company is being light on technical details in their official material. However in a brief interview with <a href="https://blocksandfiles.com/2024/07/30/micron-276-layer-3d-nand-2650-client-ssd/">Blocks & Files</a>, the company confirmed that their 276L NAND still uses a six plane architecture, which was first introduced with the 232L generation. At this point we're assuming Micron is also string-stacking two decks of NAND together, as they have been for the past couple of generations, which means we're looking at 138 layer decks.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="70%">
<tbody>
<tr class="tgrey">
<td align="center" colspan="4">Micron TLC NAND Flash Memory</td>
</tr>
<tr class="tlblue">
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1"> </td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">276L</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">232L<br />
(B58R)</td>
<td align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">176L<br />
(B47R)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Layers</td>
<td align="center">276</td>
<td align="center">232</td>
<td align="center">176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Decks</td>
<td align="center">2 (x138)?</td>
<td align="center">2 (x116)</td>
<td align="center">2 (x88)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Die Capacity</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1 Tbit</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1 Tbit</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">512 Gbit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Die Size (mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~48.9mm2</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~70.1mm2</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~49.8mm2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Density (Gbit/mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~21</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">14.6</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">10.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">I/O Speed</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">3.6 GT/s<br />
(ONFi 5.1)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">2.4 GT/s<br />
(ONFi 5.0)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1.6 GT/s<br />
(ONFI 4.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Planes</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">CuA / PuC</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>On the density front, Micron told Blocks & Files that they have improved their NAND density by 44% over their 232L generation. Which, given what we know about that generation, would put the density at around 21 Gbit/mm<sup>2</sup>. Or for a 1Tbit die of TLC NAND, that works out to a die size of roughly 48.9mm<sup>2</sup>, comparable to the die size of a 512Gbit TLC die from Micron's older 176L NAND.</p>
<p>Besides improving density, the other big push with Micron's newest generation of NAND was further improving its throughput. While the company's 232L NAND was built against the ONFi 5.0 specification, which topped out at transfer rates of 2400 MT/sec, their new 276L NAND can hit 3600 MT/sec, which is consistent with the ONFi 5.1 spec.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the eagle-eyed will likely also pick up on Micron's ninth-generation/G9 branding, which is new to the company. Micron's has not previously used this kind of generational branding for their NAND, which up until now has simply been identified by its layer count (and before the 3D era, its feature size). Internally, this is believed to be Micron's 7th generation 3D NAND architecture. However, taking a page from the logic fab industry, Micron seems to be branding it as ninth-generation in order to keep generational parity with its competitors, who are preparing their own 8th/9th generation NAND (and thus cliam that they are the first NAND maker to ship 9th gen NAND).</p>
<p>And while this NAND will eventually end up in ... SSDs){kind=link}
![](https://web.whatsapp.com/send?text=Micron Ships Denser & Faster 276 Layer TLC NAND, Arriving First In Micron 2650 Client SSDs <p align="center"><a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/21492/micron-ships-denser-9th-generation-nand-276layers-and-2650-client-ssds"><img src="https://images.anandtech.com/doci/21492/product-g9-tlc-nand-product-on-board-3-2-all-others_575px.jpeg" alt="" /></a></p><p><p>Micron on Tuesday announced that the company has begun shipping its 9th Generation (G9) 276 layer TLC NAND. The next generation of NAND from the prolific memory maker, Micron's latest NAND is designed to further push the envelope on TLC NAND performance, offering significant density and performance improvements over its existing NAND technology.</p>
<p>Micron's G9 TLC NAND memory features 276 active layers, which is up from <a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/17509/microns-232-layer-nand-now-shipping">232-layers in case of Micron's previous generation TLC NAND</a>. At this point the company is being light on technical details in their official material. However in a brief interview with <a href="https://blocksandfiles.com/2024/07/30/micron-276-layer-3d-nand-2650-client-ssd/">Blocks & Files</a>, the company confirmed that their 276L NAND still uses a six plane architecture, which was first introduced with the 232L generation. At this point we're assuming Micron is also string-stacking two decks of NAND together, as they have been for the past couple of generations, which means we're looking at 138 layer decks.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="70%">
<tbody>
<tr class="tgrey">
<td align="center" colspan="4">Micron TLC NAND Flash Memory</td>
</tr>
<tr class="tlblue">
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1"> </td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">276L</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">232L<br />
(B58R)</td>
<td align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">176L<br />
(B47R)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Layers</td>
<td align="center">276</td>
<td align="center">232</td>
<td align="center">176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Decks</td>
<td align="center">2 (x138)?</td>
<td align="center">2 (x116)</td>
<td align="center">2 (x88)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Die Capacity</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1 Tbit</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1 Tbit</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">512 Gbit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Die Size (mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~48.9mm2</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~70.1mm2</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~49.8mm2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Density (Gbit/mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~21</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">14.6</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">10.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">I/O Speed</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">3.6 GT/s<br />
(ONFi 5.1)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">2.4 GT/s<br />
(ONFi 5.0)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1.6 GT/s<br />
(ONFI 4.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Planes</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">CuA / PuC</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>On the density front, Micron told Blocks & Files that they have improved their NAND density by 44% over their 232L generation. Which, given what we know about that generation, would put the density at around 21 Gbit/mm<sup>2</sup>. Or for a 1Tbit die of TLC NAND, that works out to a die size of roughly 48.9mm<sup>2</sup>, comparable to the die size of a 512Gbit TLC die from Micron's older 176L NAND.</p>
<p>Besides improving density, the other big push with Micron's newest generation of NAND was further improving its throughput. While the company's 232L NAND was built against the ONFi 5.0 specification, which topped out at transfer rates of 2400 MT/sec, their new 276L NAND can hit 3600 MT/sec, which is consistent with the ONFi 5.1 spec.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the eagle-eyed will likely also pick up on Micron's ninth-generation/G9 branding, which is new to the company. Micron's has not previously used this kind of generational branding for their NAND, which up until now has simply been identified by its layer count (and before the 3D era, its feature size). Internally, this is believed to be Micron's 7th generation 3D NAND architecture. However, taking a page from the logic fab industry, Micron seems to be branding it as ninth-generation in order to keep generational parity with its competitors, who are preparing their own 8th/9th generation NAND (and thus cliam that they are the first NAND maker to ship 9th gen NAND).</p>
<p>And while this NAND will eventually end up in ... SSDs | https://compbuddey.blogspot.com/2024/07/micron-ships-denser-faster-276-layer_31.html){kind=link}
![](mailto:?subject=Micron Ships Denser & Faster 276 Layer TLC NAND, Arriving First In Micron 2650 Client SSDs <p align="center"><a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/21492/micron-ships-denser-9th-generation-nand-276layers-and-2650-client-ssds"><img src="https://images.anandtech.com/doci/21492/product-g9-tlc-nand-product-on-board-3-2-all-others_575px.jpeg" alt="" /></a></p><p><p>Micron on Tuesday announced that the company has begun shipping its 9th Generation (G9) 276 layer TLC NAND. The next generation of NAND from the prolific memory maker, Micron's latest NAND is designed to further push the envelope on TLC NAND performance, offering significant density and performance improvements over its existing NAND technology.</p>
<p>Micron's G9 TLC NAND memory features 276 active layers, which is up from <a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/17509/microns-232-layer-nand-now-shipping">232-layers in case of Micron's previous generation TLC NAND</a>. At this point the company is being light on technical details in their official material. However in a brief interview with <a href="https://blocksandfiles.com/2024/07/30/micron-276-layer-3d-nand-2650-client-ssd/">Blocks & Files</a>, the company confirmed that their 276L NAND still uses a six plane architecture, which was first introduced with the 232L generation. At this point we're assuming Micron is also string-stacking two decks of NAND together, as they have been for the past couple of generations, which means we're looking at 138 layer decks.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="70%">
<tbody>
<tr class="tgrey">
<td align="center" colspan="4">Micron TLC NAND Flash Memory</td>
</tr>
<tr class="tlblue">
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1"> </td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">276L</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">232L<br />
(B58R)</td>
<td align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="1">176L<br />
(B47R)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Layers</td>
<td align="center">276</td>
<td align="center">232</td>
<td align="center">176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Decks</td>
<td align="center">2 (x138)?</td>
<td align="center">2 (x116)</td>
<td align="center">2 (x88)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Die Capacity</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1 Tbit</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1 Tbit</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">512 Gbit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Die Size (mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~48.9mm2</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~70.1mm2</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~49.8mm2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Density (Gbit/mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">~21</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">14.6</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">10.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1" rowspan="1">I/O Speed</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">3.6 GT/s<br />
(ONFi 5.1)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">2.4 GT/s<br />
(ONFi 5.0)</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="1">1.6 GT/s<br />
(ONFI 4.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">Planes</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tlgrey" colspan="1">CuA / PuC</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>On the density front, Micron told Blocks & Files that they have improved their NAND density by 44% over their 232L generation. Which, given what we know about that generation, would put the density at around 21 Gbit/mm<sup>2</sup>. Or for a 1Tbit die of TLC NAND, that works out to a die size of roughly 48.9mm<sup>2</sup>, comparable to the die size of a 512Gbit TLC die from Micron's older 176L NAND.</p>
<p>Besides improving density, the other big push with Micron's newest generation of NAND was further improving its throughput. While the company's 232L NAND was built against the ONFi 5.0 specification, which topped out at transfer rates of 2400 MT/sec, their new 276L NAND can hit 3600 MT/sec, which is consistent with the ONFi 5.1 spec.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the eagle-eyed will likely also pick up on Micron's ninth-generation/G9 branding, which is new to the company. Micron's has not previously used this kind of generational branding for their NAND, which up until now has simply been identified by its layer count (and before the 3D era, its feature size). Internally, this is believed to be Micron's 7th generation 3D NAND architecture. However, taking a page from the logic fab industry, Micron seems to be branding it as ninth-generation in order to keep generational parity with its competitors, who are preparing their own 8th/9th generation NAND (and thus cliam that they are the first NAND maker to ship 9th gen NAND).</p>
<p>And while this NAND will eventually end up in ... SSDs&body=https://compbuddey.blogspot.com/2024/07/micron-ships-denser-faster-276-layer_31.html){kind=link}
Intel Sells Its Arm Shares, Reduces Stakes in Other Companies 
Intel has divested its entire stake in Arm Holdings during the second quarter, raising approximately $147 million. Alongside this, Intel sold its stake in cybersecurity firm ZeroFox and reduced its holdings in Astera Labs, all as part of a broader effort to manage costs and recover cash amid significant financial challenges.
The sale of Intel's 1.18 million shares in Arm Holdings, as reported in a recent SEC filing, comes at a time when the company is struggling with substantial financial losses. Despite the $147 million generated from the sale, Intel reported a $120 million net loss on its equity investments for the quarter, which is a part of a larger $1.6 billion loss that Intel faced during this period.
In addition to selling its stake in Arm, Intel also exited its investment in ZeroFox and reduced its involvement with Astera Labs, a company known for developing connectivity platforms for enterprise hardware. These moves are in line with Intel's strategy to reduce costs and stabilize its financial position as it faces ongoing market challenges.
Despite the divestment, Intel's past investment in Arm was likely driven by strategic considerations. Arm Holdings is a significant force in the semiconductor industry, with its designs powering most mobile devices, and, for obvious reasons, Intel would like to address these. Intel and Arm are also collaborating on datacenter platforms tailored for Intel's 18A process technology. Additionally, Arm might view Intel as a potential licensee for its technologies and a valuable partner for other companies that license Arm's designs.
Intel's investment in Astera Labs was also a strategic one as the company probably wanted to secure steady supply of smart retimers, smart cable modems, and CXL memory controller, which are used in volumes in datacenters and Intel is certainly interested in selling as many datacenter CPUs as possible.
Intel's financial struggles were highlighted earlier this month when the company released a disappointing earnings report, which led to a 33% drop in its stock value, erasing billions of dollars of capitalization. To counter these difficulties, Intel announced plans to cut 15,000 jobs and implement other expense reductions. The company has also suspended its dividend, signaling the depth of its efforts to conserve cash and focus on recovery. When it comes to divestment of Arm stock, the need for immediate financial stabilization has presumably taken precedence, leading to the decision.
CPUs
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's.
Silicon Motion Demonstrates Flexible Data Placement on MonTitan Gen 5 Enterprise SSD Platform
At FMS 2024, the technological requirements from the storage and memory subsystem took center stage. Both SSD and controller vendors had various demonstrations touting their suitability for different stages of the AI data pipeline - ingestion, preparation, training, checkpointing, and inference. Vendors like Solidigm have different types of SSDs optimized for different stages of the pipeline. At the same time, controller vendors have taken advantage of one of the features introduced recently in the NVM Express standard - Flexible Data Placement (FDP).
FDP involves the host providing information / hints about the areas where the controller could place the incoming write data in order to reduce the write amplification. These hints are generated based on specific block sizes advertised by the device. The feature is completely backwards-compatible, with non-FDP hosts working just as before with FDP-enabled SSDs, and vice-versa.
Silicon Motion's MonTitan Gen 5 Enterprise SSD Platform was announced back in 2022. Since then, Silicon Motion has been touting the flexibility of the platform, allowing its customers to incorporate their own features as part of the customization process. This approach is common in the enterprise space, as we have seen with Marvell's Bravera SC5 SSD controller in the DapuStor SSDs and Microchip's Flashtec controllers in the Longsys FORESEE enterprise SSDs.
At FMS 2024, the company was demonstrating the advantages of flexible data placement by allowing a single QLC SSD based on their MonTitan platform to take part in different stages of the AI data pipeline while maintaining the required quality of service (minimum bandwidth) for each process. The company even has a trademarked name (PerformaShape) for the firmware feature in the controller that allows the isolation of different concurrent SSD accesses (from different stages in the AI data pipeline) to guarantee this QoS. Silicon Motion claims that this scheme will enable its customers to get the maximum write performance possible from QLC SSDs without negatively impacting the performance of other types of accesses.
Silicon Motion and Phison have market leadership in the client SSD controller market with similar approaches. However, their enterprise SSD controller marketing couldn't be more different. While Phison has gone in for a turnkey solution with their Gen 5 SSD platform (to the extent of not adopting the white label route for this generation, and instead opting to get the SSDs qualified with different cloud service providers themselves), Silicon Motion is opting for a different approach. The flexibility and customization possibilities can make platforms like the MonTitan appeal to flash array vendors.
Storage
U.S. Signs $1.5B in CHIPS Act Agreements With Amkor and SKhynix for Chip Packaging Plants
Under the CHIPS & Science Act, the U.S. government provided tens of billions of dollars in grants and loans to the world's leading maker of chips, such as Intel, Samsung, and TSMC, which will significantly expand the country's semiconductor production industry in the coming years. However, most chips are typically tested, assembled, and packaged in Asia, which has left the American supply chain incomplete. Addressing this last gap in the government's domestic chip production plans, these past couple of weeks the U.S. government signed memorandums of understanding worth about $1.5 billion with Amkor and SK hynix to support their efforts to build chip packaging facilities in the U.S.
Amkor to Build Advanced Packaging Facility with Apple in Mind
Amkor plans to build a $2 billion advanced packaging facility near Peoria, Arizona, to test and assemble chips produced by TSMC at its Fab 21 near Phoenix, Arizona. The company signed a MOU that offers $400 million in direct funding and access to $200 million in loans under the CHIPS & Science Act. In addition, the company plans to take advantage of a 25% investment tax credit on eligible capital expenditures.
Set to be strategically positioned near TSMC's upcoming Fab 21 complex in Arizona, Amkor's Peoria facility will occupy 55 acres and, when fully completed, will feature over 500,000 square feet (46,451 square meters) of cleanroom space, more than twice the size of Amkor's advanced packaging site in Vietnam. Although the company has not disclosed the exact capacity or the specific technologies the facility will support, it is expected to cater to a wide range of industries, including automotive, high-performance computing, and mobile technologies. This suggests the new plant will offer diverse packaging solutions, including traditional, 2.5D, and 3D technologies.
Amkor has collaborated extensively with Apple on the vision and initial setup of the Peoria facility, as Apple is slated to be the facility's first and largest customer, marking a significant commitment from the tech giant. This partnership highlights the importance of the new facility in reinforcing the U.S. semiconductor supply chain and positioning Amkor as a key partner for companies relying on TSMC's manufacturing capabilities. The project is expected to generate around 2,000 jobs and is scheduled to begin operations in 2027.
SK hynix to Build HBM4 in the U.S.
This week SK hynix also signed a preliminary agreement with the U.S. government to receive up to $450 million in direct funding and $500 million in loans to build an advanced memory packaging facility in West Lafayette, Indiana.
The proposed facility is scheduled to begin operations in 2028, which means that it will assemble HBM4 or HBM4E memory. Meanwhile, DRAM devices for high bandwidth memory (HBM) stacks will still be produced in South Korea. Nonetheless, packing finished HBM4/HBM4E in the U.S. and possibly integrating these memory modules with high-end processors is a big deal.
In addition to building its packaging plant, SK hynix plans to collaborate with Purdue University and other local research institutions to advance semiconductor technology and packaging innovations. This partnership is intended to bolster research and development in the region, positioning the facility as a hub for AI technology and skilled employment.
Semiconductors
0 Comments